MINUTES OF BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
LANSING BOARD OF WATER AND LIGHT
___________________________
Tuesday, May 23, 2000
___________________________
The Board of Commissioners met in regular session at 5:30 p.m., in the Boardroom of the Administrative Offices, 1232 Haco Drive, Lansing, Michigan. The meeting was called to order by Chair Diane Royal.
|
Present: |
Commissioners Rosemarie E. Aquilina, Ernest J. Christian, Charles M. Creamer, Mark A. Murray, David O ’Leary, and Diane R. Royal. |
|
Absent: |
Commissioners Ronald C. Callen and Judson M. Werbelow. |
The Acting Secretary declared a quorum present.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said by all.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion was made by Commissioner O
’Leary, seconded by Commissioner Creamer, to approve the minutes of regular session held April 25, 2000.Carried unanimously.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
THE CHAIR ANNOUNCED THAT MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE WELCOME TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY AGENDA SUBJECT OR ON ANY OTHER SUBJECT NOW, OR AT THE END OF THE MEETING.
Fred Porter from the NAACP, 3700 West Holmes, spoke on surveys conducted on governmental agencies goods and services purchased. He made reference to a letter from the BWL dated March 24, 2000, and commended the Board on what it intends to do. However, he expressed disappointment on the low percentage of minority vendors being utilized by the BWL.
Brenda Hanford, 3631 Birchfield Dr., spoke regarding her utility bill. She and her husband have been trying to get on an equal monthly payment plan with the BWL and it ha s been denied.
Dick Taylor, BWL Test Group, spoke on the BWL Compensation Plan that was discussed at the Committee of the Whole meeting, and is to be voted on this evening. Mr. Taylor feels that there are still many unanswered questions regarding this plan. Several of the requests that he made at the Board Meeting of April 25, 2000, have not yet been addressed.
COMMUNICATIONS
An anonymous letter was received regarding the proposed pay plan for non-union workers, and a resolution approving taking $3.2 million a year, for the next 20 years, from the defined benefit pension plan.
Received and placed on file.
REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
#2000-5-1
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT
The Committee of the Whole met on May 9, 2000, to discuss and consider the following items:
|
1. |
Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget |
|
2. |
Rate Review for Electric, Water and Steam Utilities |
|
3. |
Compensation Plan |
|
4. |
Consolidated Utility Policies and Customer Choice |
Present were Commissioners Aquilina, Christian, Creamer, Murray, O
Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget.
Chief Financial Officer Dana Tousley presented details of the preliminary budget by process for FY 2000-2001. He reviewed the history of rate increases, projected income statement and sales and revenue forecast.
Following discussion, the Committee concurred with the proposed budget as submitted. A resolution for the adoption of the FY 2000-2001 is included in the General Manager
’s Recommendations for consideration at the regular meeting of May 23, 2000.Click here to see FY 2000-2001 Budget online.
Utility Rate Review.
Chief Financial Officer Dana Tousley presented an overview of the FY 2000-2001 annual rate review process and the BWL’s financial condition. He reported that additional revenue is needed to reinvest in the system. Rate adjustments need to be considered for the electric, water and steam utilities. Options reviewed included:
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 2003 |
|
|
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 2003 |
|
|
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 2003 |
|
The Committee voted unanimously to recommend the setting of a public hearing date of July 11, 2000, to consider proposed rate adjustments for electric, water and steam. This item is included in the General Manager
’s Recommendations for consideration at the regular meeting of May 23, 2000.Miscellaneous Fees and Charges.
General Manager Pandy presented an overview of various fees and charges associated with trenching, site inspections, pole attachments, and other related services. It was noted that some of the fees and charges have not been revised in a number of years.
Following discussion, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend approval of the changes to the electric and water fees and charges in the form presented. This item is included in the General Manager
’s Recommendations for consideration at the regular meeting of May 23, 2000.Compensation Plan.
General Manager Pandy and Human Resources Director Linda Gardner presented an overview of the history and the fundamental approach of the new compensation plan for non-bargaining employees. The new pay structure includes two major components: base pay and variable pay. Base pay for each skill family is competitive with the market. Pay ranges will be adjusted annually, based on market surveys. Variable pay is compensation above base pay. It must be re-earned each year, based on performance results on achievement of annual objectives. Variable pay includes multiple components based on the balanced scorecard concept, consisting of the following incentives:
Corporate: Corporate measures and results.
Process: Measures and performance results for each of the processes.
Individual: Individual employee performance.
Six employees spoke during the Public Comments portion of the meeting to express their concerns regarding the salary survey, performance appraisal system and retaining skilled and technical employees at the BWL.
Following discussion, the Committee of the Whole voted, five to one, to take from the table the Resolution to Adopt the New Compensation Plan for Non Bargaining Unit Employees, as amended and attached to this Report, for consideration at the regular meeting on May 23, 2000. (YEAS: Aquilina, Christian, Creamer, O
’Leary, Werbelow. NAYS: Murray. ABSENT: Callen, Royal)Consolidated Utility Policies and Customer Choice.
General Manager Pandy reported on a new approach for water system extensions to provide timely service to customers and reduce costs. The continuing expansion of the water utility retail service area has resulted in significant additional required work effort in the primary areas of engineering, records management and construction. Although these impacts are funded by customer charges and contributions in aid of construction, new and innovative ways of doing business are required to meet the market demand for retail water service without increasing installation delays and backlogs and without increasing BWL exposure to unrecovered costs. A team from the Delivery and Marketing processes explored and analyzed the impact and options available to meet the challenges. The team concluded that the BWL should develop a process that will allow
"customer choice" for service installations and watermain installation on customer sites. Customer choice provides the customer the option of choosing whether to have qualified contractors, or plumbers install water system components within the requirements of the BWL for same, or have the BWL install at a defined cost.Following discussion, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend the approval of the proposed Customer Choice program. This item is included in the General Manager
’s Recommendations for consideration at the regular meeting of May 23, 2000.Submitted by:
Charles M. Creamer, Chair Pro
Committee of the Whole
Discussion: General Manager Pandy read the three new amendments made to the resolution on the new Compensation Plan. Commissioner Murray appreciated staff considering his concerns expressed in the Board Meeting of April 25, 2000. Commissioner Royal expressed her concern about the performance criteria not being formulated before the Board of Commissioners are asked to vote on the plan.
Motion by Commissioner Creamer, seconded by Commissioner O
’Leary, to receive the Committee of the Whole Report.Action: Adopted unanimously.
GENERAL MANAGER
Background materials on items presented are on file in the Office of the Corporate Secretary.
#2000-5-2
APPROVAL OF UNION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the Board of Water and Light (BWL) and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 352 recognize the critical and ongoing need to improve customer service and reduce cost. As part of this labor agreement, the BWL and IBEW Local 352 are committed to a partnership; working together to improve the BWL
’s ability to compete in a rapidly changing marketplace.RESOLVED, That the four-year agreement reached between Management and the Union Negotiating Committee is retroactive to November 1, 1999, unless otherwise designated in the agreement, and is hereby approved. The labor agreement is to expire at Midnight, October 31, 2003.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Chair and the Secretary be authorized to sign the labor agreement incorporating the settlement changes. An executive summary of major issues resolved is attached. (See Attachment C.)
Motion by Commissioner Christian, seconded by Commissioner Creamer, to adopt the resolution.
Action: Carried unanimously.
#2000-5-3
EXTENSION OF COAL SALES AGREEMENT
RESOLVED, that the current coal requirements agreement dated June 26, 1996 for Moores Park Steam Plant between BWL and Lodestar Energy be extended six (6) months, starting October 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001 at a reduction in price of 6.3%.
In consideration of the contract extension, Lodestar has agreed to provide not less than 35,000 tons from 4/19/00 until 9/30/00 and not less that 35,000 tons from 10/1/00 until 3/31/01.
Motion by Commissioner O
’Leary, seconded by Commissioner Christian, to adopt the resolution.Action: Carried unanimously.
#2000-5-4
REVISION OF ELECTRIC FEES AND CHARGES
RESOLVED, that the BWL charges identified in the "Board of Water and Light Rules for Electric Service" be revised, effective June 1, 2000, as follows:
|
ELECTRIC FEES and CHARGES |
||||
|
Charge Description |
When Applied |
Proposed Charge |
Previous Charge |
Last Revised |
|
Residential line extensions |
Greater than 600 ft |
At cost |
$2.10 /ft |
May 22, 1989 |
|
Winter Construction charge |
December 15 – March 1 |
$8.50 /trench ft |
$6.00 /trench ft |
May 22, 1989 |
|
Site Inspection |
When applicable |
$75 ea. |
$15 ea. |
May 22, 1989 |
|
Residential direct-buried service |
When requested by customer |
$4.00 /trench ft $200 minimum |
$2.40 /trench ft |
May 22, 1989 |
|
Commercial direct-buried service |
When requested by customer |
$4.00 /trench ft $200 minimum |
$2.40 /trench ft $100 minimum |
May 22, 1989 |
|
Riser pole charge |
When requested by customer |
$250 ea. |
$75 ea. |
May 22, 1989 |
|
Temporary service overhead |
Install & remove service drop, 100 ft max |
$185 ea. |
$65 ea. |
May 22, 1989 |
|
Temporary underground (Normal) |
When requested by customer, Connection & disconnection only April 15 – November 1 |
$350 ea. |
$80 ea. |
May 22, 1989 |
|
Temporary underground (Winter) |
When requested by customer, Connection & disconnection only November 1 – April 15 |
$350 ea. |
$215 ea. |
May 22, 1989 |
|
Joint trench charges |
To other utilities |
$1.70 if 3 joint users $2.55 if 2 joint users Winter charge may also apply. |
$1.75 /ft summer $2.75 /ft winter (may include winter charge also |
|
The updating of Electric and Water Fees and Charges will positively impact BWL capital requirements by increasing the expected contribution in aid received from new customers, thus reducing BWL capital requirements by an estimated $75,000 in Fiscal 2001.
Discussion: Commissioner Aquilina inquired if the changes in fees and charges need to be part of the Public Hearing. Chief Financial Officer Dana Tousley responded that the fees do not affect the price of electric, water or steam.
Commissioner O
’Leary noted that the water, electric and steam rates, as proposed, may be changed after the Public Hearing.Motion by Commissioner Aquilina, seconded by Commissioner O
’Leary, to adopt the resolution.Action: Carried unanimously.
#2000-5-5
REVISION OF WATER FEES AND CHARGES
RESOLVED, that the BWL charges for Water service and hydrant construction and operation be changed, effective June 1, 2000, as follows:
|
WATER FEES and CHARGES |
||||
|
Charge Description |
When Applied |
Proposed Charge |
|
Last Revised |
|
Water Main Installation Charges, 6 " & 8", larger sizes by agreement |
Unimproved road w/ fire coverage, (1/2 amount = Frontage Fee, if not previously collected) |
$27.10 /ft |
$27.10 /ft |
Apr 20, 1999 |
|
Improved Roads |
Estimated Cost |
15% adder |
Dec 31, 1996 |
|
|
Fire Hydrant installation charge |
Charged on mains 12 " & smaller |
$2,165 ea. |
$2,015 ea. |
Apr 20, 1999 |
|
Up to and incl. 1 " Main-to-Curb Box |
$850 ea. |
$850 ea. |
Apr 20, 1999 |
|
|
Water Services |
Up to and incl. 1 " Curb Box-to-Building |
$15.10 /ft |
$14.67 /ft |
Apr 20, 1999 |
|
(Connection Fee applicable) |
Up to and incl. 1 " split irrigation service |
$350 ea. |
$135 ea. |
Jan 1, 1994 |
|
Greater than 1 " Main-to-Curb Box |
Firm price quote |
Firm price quote |
Jan 1, 1997 |
|
|
Greater than 1 " Curb Box-to-Building |
Firm price quote |
Firm price quote |
Jan 1, 1997 |
|
|
Greater than 1 " split irrigation service |
Firm price quote |
Firm price quote |
Jan 1, 1997 |
|
|
Winter Construction |
Water Services, 2 " and under |
$12.50 /ft adder |
$3.00 /ft adder |
|
|
Additional charges |
Frontage Fees and split services other than published sizes, restoration, relocations, etc. |
Firm price quote |
Firm price quote |
|
| Frozen meter charge | 2nd occurrence, or after notice |
5/8 " = $137¾ " = $1501 " = $1751 ½ " = $4262 " = $598
|
5/8 " = $137¾ " = $1501 " = $1751 ½ " = $4262 " = $598
|
Oct 7, 1999 |
The Water Fees and Charges are brought up to date to reflect the BWL's actual cost of providing such services. In the future, these fees and charges will be updated annually.
The updating of Electric and Water fees and charges will positively impact BWL's capital requirements by increasing the expected contribution in aid received from new customers, thus reducing BWL capital requirements by an estimated $75,000 in Fiscal 2001.
Motion by Commissioner Creamer, seconded by Commissioner Aquilina, to adopt the resolution.
Action: Carried unanimously.
#2000-5-6
POLE ATTACHMENT FEES
RESOLVED, that the BWL Pole Attachment fees be changed, effective June 1, 2000, and previous Resolutions rescinded, as follows:
|
ELECTRIC FEES and CHARGES |
||||
|
Charge Description |
When Applied |
Proposed Charge |
Previous Charge |
Last Revised |
|
Joint Use and Third Party, make ready |
At cost |
At cost |
Various Agreements |
|
|
Pole Attachment fees |
Annual fee |
$9.75 per attachment $200 minimum |
$4.95 per pole $60 minimum |
January 1, 1987 |
|
Application deposit, credited to make ready costs |
$15 per pole $300 minimum |
$15 per pole $100 minimum |
January 1, 1987 |
|
The updating of the Pole Attachment fees are expected to generate an additional $120,000 in revenue in Fiscal 2001.
Motion by Commissioner Christian, seconded by Commissioner Murray, to adopt the resolution.
Action: Carried unanimously.
#2000-5-7
CUSTOMER CHOICE FOR WATER SERVICE & MAIN INSTALLATIONS
RESOLVED, That BWL will allow customer choice for water service and main installations on customer sites. Customer choice will allow qualified contractors and/or developers to construct water system installations that meet BWL specifications and construction standards; the water system installations constructed in this manner will become assets that are owned by the BWL.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That fees be assessed to recover the cost of ensuring compliance with these specifications and standards.
Motion by Commissioner Creamer, seconded by Commissioner Murray, to adopt the resolution.
Action: Carried unanimously.
#2000-5-8
PROPOSED RATE SCHEDULES
RESOLVED, that the proposed water, electric, and steam, rate schedules listed below and detailed in the attached proposed rate schedules be made the subject of a public hearing prior to further consideration by the Board of Commissioners. (Copies may be obtained from the Corporate Secretary
’s Office.)|
Adopted |
Effective |
|
|
Water Utility |
||
|
Rate No. 1 – Residential Water Service |
09/27/94 |
10/15/94 |
|
Rate No. 2 – Commercial & Industrial Water Service |
10/21/93 |
01/01/94 |
|
Rate No. 3 – Water System Connection Fees |
07/29/97 |
09/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 4 – Fire Service and Fire Hydrant Charges |
12/21/93 |
01/01/94 |
|
Rate No. 5 – Lawn Sprinkling Water Service |
12/21/93 |
01/01/94 |
|
Lansing City Enterprise Community Rebate |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Electric Utility |
||
|
Rate No. 1 – Residential Electric Service |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 2 – Residential All-Electric Service |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 3 – General Electric Service |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 4 – Large General Electric Service |
07/29/97 |
09/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 5 – Primary Electric Service |
07/29/97 |
09/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 7 – Municipal Water Pumping Electric Service |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 9 – Outdoor Lighting Service |
01/26/99 |
02/01/99 |
|
Rate No. 10 – Process Heating Electric Service |
07/29/97 |
09/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 11 – Traffic Light Service |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 12 – Space Conditioning and Electric Water Heating Service |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 21 – Residential Electric Service – Senior Citizen |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 31 – Street Lighting Service – Board Owned Systems |
01/26/99 |
02/01/99 |
|
Rate No. 32 – Street lighting Service – Customer Owned Systems |
01/26/99 |
02/01/99 |
|
Economic Development Rider |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Lansing City Enterprise Community Rebate |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Proposed Renewable Energy Rider (Green Power) |
|
Steam Utility |
||
|
Rate No. 1 – General Steam Service |
12/20/94 |
01/13/95 |
|
Lansing City Enterprise Community Rebate |
11/26/96 |
01/01/97 |
|
Rate No. 1 – General Chilled Water Service |
03/26/91 |
04/15/91 |
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a public hearing to solicit public input on
this matter be set for Tuesday, July 11, 2000 at 5:30 p.m., in the
Board of Water and Light Offices at 1232 Haco Drive. Also that the
Corporate Secretary be directed to file with the City Clerk
information regarding pending changes in the rate structures on or
before May 26, 2000.
Discussion: The Commissioners discussed the proposed options for electric, water and steam. Mr. Pandy showed slides giving a history of rates, and indicating why the Board of Water and Light is asking for a rate increase. He reported that the City plans to raise sewer rates and City Officials have asked the BWL to hold off on the rate increase until January 1, 2001. Mr. Pandy explained that waiting until January 2001 would result in about $1.95 million revenue loss for the five months. Commissioner O
’Leary inquired as to how the new deregulation bill would affect the electric rate increase. Mr. Pandy announced that the deregulation bill passed the Senate today by a vote of 25 to 12. The BWL remains exempt from Public Service Commission rules; all BWL rates are the authority of the Board of Commissioners. Even with a rate increase, BWL rates remain below those of Consumers Energy and Detroit Edison. Discussion ensued on how levelized rates affect cash flow and the cost of postponing the rate increases.Motion by Commissioner Royal, seconded by Commissioner O
’Leary, to adopt the resolution.Action: Carried unanimously.
#2000-5-9
FY 2001 BUDGET
RESOLVED, That the annual budget covering Fiscal 2000-2001 be approved as presented. (See Attachment B.)
FURTHER RESOLVED, That capital projects are authorized in the amount of the project estimate. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2000-2001 are limited to the amount included in the budget.
Motion by Commissioner Creamer, seconded by Commissioner Aquilina, to adopt the resolution.
Action: Carried unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
#2000-5-10
Resolution to Adopt New Compensation Plan for Non-Bargaining Unit
Employees
WHEREAS, Dorey, Reagan & Associates (consultant) was engaged by the BWL
(Resolution #2000-1-4) to assist staff with the following goals:|
1. |
Recommend and implement changes to the Non-Bargaining Unit compensation plan. |
|
2. |
Align the compensation system with a process-based organization. |
|
3. |
Provide information enabling the BWL to design pay strategies, which are market driven. |
The last redesign of the BWL compensation system was conducted in June, 1980.
WHEREAS, Staff and the consultant presented details of the new compensation plan for Non-Bargaining Unit employees with recommendations regarding changes.
WHEREAS, as discussed by the Personnel Committee on October 27, 1999, and approved by the Board, the Board of Water and Light base pay in relation to market is established at the 50th percentile.
WHEREAS, The internal equity issue related to the Technical Skill Family, Grades 1 through 6, was reassessed, especially in relation to the Bargaining Unit.
RESOLVED:
|
1. |
That the report on the new BWL Compensation Plan for Non-Bargaining Unit employees, submitted by Human Resources and consultant Dorey, Reagan & Associates, dated April 4, 2000, be received and filed. |
|
2. |
That based on staff analysis and subsequent review by the Board, the market rate for the Technical Skill Family—Grades 1 through 6--be established at the 65th percentile of the grade range. |
|
3. |
That the 5% over maximum limit for Non-Bargaining Unit Employee increases be lifted for FY 1999-2000 only. This qualifies Non-Bargaining Unit Employees for a one-time variable pay increase that may exceed the maximum. |
|
4. |
That the individual variable pay amount be offered in a lump sum rather than being spread over 26 pay periods. |
|
5. |
That the General Manager be authorized to implement the recommended changes to the salary ranges and pay structures as set forth in the report on skill families effective July 1, 2000. |
|
6. |
That 3.5% of the Non-Bargaining Unit employee payroll be budgeted for FY 2000-2001 to be used for performance increases, based on variable amounts, effective July 1, 2000. |
|
7. |
That the General Manager be authorized to
implement a variable pay plan for the non-bargaining unit
employees for FY 2000-2001 with the following components: Maximum Variable Pay Percentage of Base Corporate Share The Success 2.5% Process Performance Results 5.0% Individual Performance Incentive 7.5% |
|
8. |
That the General Manager be authorized to pay employees with skills and experience which are critical to the BWL at base pay levels above the 50th percentile. These exceptions shall be reviewed in consultation with the Assistant General Manager and Director of Human Resources. |
|
9. |
That in order to emphasize the importance of performance appraisals and feedback for employees, all directors’ and managers’ individual incentive pay for FY 2000-2001 shall have 5% of the total 7.5% variable pay determined on the basis of the quality of performance appraisals conducted by these directors and managers. |
|
10. |
That the new compensation plan shall be
set as a two-tiered system.
|
This proposed change allows for a gradual transition to the new plan and reduces the percentage of employees above market rate by approximately 30%. Furthermore, it will shift approximately $200,000 from variable to base pay, with an additional $30,000 for pension and benefit costs.
Motion by Commissioner Murray, seconded by Commissioner Creamer, to take the proposed resolution for the Compensation Plan off the table.
Action: Motion to take off the table was carried unanimously.
Discussion Prior To Vote: Commissioner Christian expressed concern on the current lack of an appraisal system. Human Resource Director Linda Gardner stated that the appraisal system is in the process of being developed. She reported that Position Description Questionnaires (PDQ
’s) are currently being used as job descriptions, but have not yet been transferred to job descriptions. Commissioner Christian also asked Ms. Gardner how many appeals had been received. She responded that 120 out of 316 employees had filed appeals, this equals about 42%. Commissioner Royal expressed concern that she does not see the necessity of pushing this pay plan too quickly, but would rather see the plan further developed before it is voted upon. Mr. Pandy stated that this is a continuous improvement plan, which may not be totally in place in the beginning. The plan will be ongoing and will change year after year.The Chair called the question on the Resolution to Adopt the New Compensation Plan for Non Bargaining Unit Employees, as amended.
Action: The resolution was not passed, as five affirmative votes of the total Board are required for passage.
YEAS: Aquilina, Creamer, Murray, O
’Leary - 4
#2000-5-11
PROPOSED RESOLUTION TO OFFER THE ROTH IRA PROGRAM TO EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, The Board of Water and Light desires to provide a payroll deduction Roth IRA Program to the employee pension options, and
WHEREAS, Roth IRA contributions may be made after withholding taxes up to an annual contribution of $2,000.00, and
WHEREAS, ICMA manages the BWL
’s 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and offers an IRS-approved Roth Program, andWHEREAS, Prudential, which manages the BWL Defined Contribution Plan investments, offers an IRS-approved Roth Program, and
RESOLVED, That the BWL is hereby authorized to offer payroll deduction to its employees for Roth IRA options from both ICMA and Prudential retirement services.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Chief Financial Officer is directed to take such actions as may be necessary to carry the Roth IRA Program into operation.
Discussion: Commissioners discussed the advantages and disadvantages of Roth IRA
’s.Motion by Commissioner Christian, seconded by Commissioner Murray, to adopt the resolution.
Action: Carried unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS
#2000-5-12
RESOLUTION HONORING JOHN ELASHKAR
WHEREAS, the Lansing Board of Water and Light Commissioners wish to honor John Elashkar on the occasion of his retirement from the BWL on May 20, 2000, after more than 30 years of outstanding service and exceptional achievements, and
WHEREAS, Hanna El-Ashkar had arrived in the United States of America as an alien visitor with six months visa from his home in Deir Mimas, Merjeyoun, Lebanon and was hired by the BWL in 1970 as a civil engineer, having graduated from the American University of Beirut; and
WHEREAS, John Elashkar became a naturalized citizen of the United State of America on October 28, 1976; and
WHEREAS, John Elashkar
’s professional competence as an engineer was recognized by the BWL in a series of promotions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHEREAS, John Elashkar
’s breadth of knowledge and technical skills were recognized by the BWL in the fields of Information Systems, Environmental Services, Construction Services, and Materials Services resulting in his promotion to Director of Technical Services in 1990; andWHEREAS, John Elashkar
’s business judgment and managerial expertise were recognized by the BWL in his promotion to Assistant General Manager in October, 1998; andWHEREAS, John Elashkar
’s intelligence, experience, and professional discipline has contributed enormously to the citizens of the Greater Lansing Region in the provision of reliable, efficient and safe electrical power, public water supply and thermal energy; and under his leadership, BWL engineered and constructed over $443 million of capital improvements; andWHEREAS, John Elashkar
’s engineering skills permanently changed the skyline of Lansing with construction of BWL’s modern electrostatic precipitators and three power plant chimneys towering 624 feet above the Eckert Power Station.NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Water and Light Commissioners salute the many achievements, dedication, and professional competence of John Elashkar.
RESOLVED FURTHER, that in keeping with his highest achievement, the Board of Water and Light Commissioners do hereby designate and name the Eckert Power Station Chimneys as
"John Elashkar Monuments", and direct that a plaque commemorating his career at the BWL be affixed at the Eckert Power Station in honor of John Elashkar’s many contribution to the well-being of our community.Action: Resolution approved by consensus.
Retired Assistant General Manager John Elashkar expressed his gratitude to the Board of Water and Light for his 30 years of employment. He said that he learned a lot, and developed valuable friendships.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REMARKS
Chilled Water Contract
– State of Michigan: General Manager Pandy announced there is a signed agreement with the State of Michigan for Chilled Water. Construction will begin this summer. The BWL will work with the City on a noise ordinance so that work can be done from 6:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. Mr. Pandy expressed his appreciation for the work of Clyde Dugan, John Elashkar, Sue McCormick, Jan Nelson, Dana Tousley and Larry Wilhite, in securing this agreement.Commissioner Christian asked for the time line of this project. Mr. Pandy said that service will begin in the Spring of 2001.
Ottawa Station Update: General Manager Pandy handed out color-drawings showing a rendering of the proposed Ottawa Station Redevelopment Project. The feasibility study from Steiner and Associates has not yet been received.
REMARKS BY COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner Christian expressed his appreciation to John Elashkar for everything he has done for the Board of Water and Light, and wished him well in his retirement.
EXCUSED ABSENCES
By Commissioner Christian, seconded by Commissioner Murray, that the absences of Commissioners Callen and Werbelow be excused.
Adopted unanimously.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
THE CHAIR ANNOUNCED THAT MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE WELCOME TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY BOARD OF WATER AND LIGHT SUBJECT.
Cathy Gorman, BWL Employee, expressed her appreciation on not passing the Compensation Plan.
ADJOURNMENT
On motion by Commissioner Christian, seconded by Commissioner Creamer, the meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
/s/ Rosemary Sullivan, Acting Secretary
Filed: May 30, 2000
__________________________
Marilynn Slade, City Clerk
Attachment A
– Contact the Corporate Secretary’s Office for a copy of the proposed rates.Attachment B
– Contact the Corporate Secretary’s Office for a copy of the Budget.Attachment C
– Appended belowAttachment C
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT PACKAGE
November 1, 1999
Basic Agreement
|
A. |
Four (4) year agreement retroactive to November 1, 1999 (expiring October 31, 2003). |
|
B. |
Parties agree to a "Moving Forward Statement" that will replace the "Living Agreement". |
Economic Changes
|
A. |
Wage Increases |
||
|
11/1/99 – 10/31/00 3.5% |
|||
|
11/1/00 – 10/31/01 3.0% |
|||
|
11/1/01 – 10/31/02 3.0% |
|||
|
11/1/02 – 10/31/03 3.0% |
|||
| B. | A 0.5% Lump Sum bonus which equals $229.00 per BU employee, for the elimination of the 90/10 program. | ||
| C. | Revised Attachment A-1 effective for employees hired on and after July 1, 2000. | ||
| D. | Uniformity of premium for Production Relief Operators $.35 to $.50/hour. | ||
| E. | Health Care | ||
| 1. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan-Preferred Provider Organization-Community Blue. Includes choice of physicians (No requirement to have Primary Care Physicians) and hospita ls. | |||
| 2. Prescription drug co-pay of $2.00 for generic and $12.00 for brand named drugs. Office visit co-pays are still $5.00. The Flexible Spending Account may be used for any out of pocket medical expenses including prescription drug co-pays. The prescription drugs will be provided by National Prescription Administrators (N.P.A.) and will include a mail order package for maintenance prescriptions. | |||
| 3. Delta Dental-continuation of current insurance | |||
| 4. Cap on cash-in-lieu of equal to $186.00 per month. | |||
| F. | Paid Time Off Credit increased
from 150 to a maximum of 175 days. |
||
Other Issues
| A. | Eliminate Acting Supervisor pay. | |
| B. | Eliminate First Occasions. | |
| 1. Last pay out of 6.5 – 9 days in April 2000. | ||
| 2. Revised Excessive Absenteeism Program – changes eligibility requirements. | ||
| C. | Will handle grievances, special conferences, etc., in regularly scheduled weekly meetings with the Union B.A. and the Director H.R. and report out to the rest of the organization. | |
| D. | Memorandums of Understanding that already exist will be placed in a separate book. | |
| E. | Attachment B – Electric Production – Steam Production Operators will be eligible to bid for positions in the Electric Production Process. | |
| F. | Attachment E – All except two (2) Apprenticeships have been revised to incorporate Federal Department of Labor, Bureau of Training, standards. | |
| G. | Housekeeping Items | |
| 1. Language revised to incorporate Process Organization titles. | ||
| 2. Some language placed into the body of the contract. | ||
| H. | Extension of 60-day provision for Permanent Transfers. Will use the same language that is used for extending Probationary employees. | |
| I. | 20-day language for bidding on jobs has been replaced with 15 days and 5 days for visiting another job or re-bidding on a job. | |